Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Should Encourage Juan Mata

Orange versus Blue game

Brian wasn't able to watch the Orange versus Blue game, and I see the folks over at Gobbler Country and The Key Play are falling over themselves to gleefully gloat about how horrible the game was. "DERP, they said it had just hailed but it looks sunny to me on ESPN3!" Apparently they all found time to watch the Orange versus Blue football game rather than the UVA/VT Baseball game in Blacksburg today. Says something about VT baseball, I suppose.

Here's a helpful picture to illustrate the thought processes (or lack thereof) of our friends in Blacksburg:

Anyhow, as I sat through the intermittent freezing, warming, and hailing through the (embarassing) lacrosse game and into the Orange versus Blue game, I thought I'd give my thoughts. Actually, I agree with a lot about what they're saying 'cross the blogoverse, minus the derp.

1) No quarterback stood out. Ahhh, You could tell Metheny and Rocco learned from Marc Verica. They’re like Brett Favre- brilliant for awhile, but then… boneheaded, just boneheaded mistakes. And when they’re good, they’re not good enough to make up for the boneheadedness like Favre was. Watford looked like he had potential, but this ain't high school ball. This is the big leagues. He just needs some time, though, he looks like he's mobile and the way the offensive lines played today, he's gonna need to be. Strauss gave the most consistent performance of the day, in my humble opinion, but that's akin to calling yourself the best dressed man in Montgomery County.

Look, Joe Montana sucked as a quarterback. Weak arm, couldn't laser it. Fact. But Bill Walsh and Bill Parcels evolved the game around his weaknesses, and who can argue with the results? You either get someone like Aaron Rodgers, who can be mobile and make up for the deficiencies in an offense line, or you gotta be able to change the offensive game to suit 'em, like Joe Montana.

I don't envy the choice Mike London has to make here. Do you go with Metheny or Rocco? They have playing time. Or do you go with Watford and start from scratch, bumps and bruises all, and mold him into the QB he has the potential to be?

2) Sloppy! Illegal formations, twice. Unsportsmanlike conduct in a football game when you're PLAYING YOURSELF? Sheesh. Unacceptable, really. Swanson picked up a punt Perry Jones dropped and thought he'd taken it into the end zone for a TD... nope. Cost Orange 15 yards and they had to turn it over. Hope Swanson got to do some laps or pushups. He seems like a good tight end- had an awesome play at the end of the game, his arms are about ten miles long and he proved how that can be an asset- but given the amount of penalties from last season, Mike London needs to stomp on this sort of behavior immediately. How many games could've at least potentially been won on the margin of a penalty or two last year? What were we, third from the bottom in the NCAA on penalties?

3) On the note of sloppiness again, cranking it up a notch. Again, I saw some of the same things this year as last year- two steps behind a thrown pass. One step behind a miss tackle. Again, things on the margin. Gotta tighten the screws!

4) The running game su- well, it would suck if it existed.

Now that my armchair quarterback schtick is done, there were some awesome plays today. Great early touchdown by Perry Jones, who went flipping over a blocker and into the end zone. Outstanding interceptions by Chase Minnifield and Dom Jones, the latter for a pick-6. Not as great news for Rocco and Strauss respectively of course, heh, but the defense doing what it ought. Steve Greer looks like he's working on being a less-shaggy version of Clay Matthews- first UVA game Greer got to sit in on, he watched Clay Matthews take apart the Cavalier offense, so he's seen the model to emulate. Rodney McLeod had some good hits. As I said, if they can tighten the screws on the defense, they should work well this fall.

Mike London's got his work cut out for him, though, that's fer damn sure. I'm calling it 5-7 for the year now; 7-5 if we're lucky. We can do it- in the meantime, though, we need to just be patient. Look at how long it took Frank Beamer to bring Tech back around- took him, what, six or seven years to get a winning program- and THAT was while his Hokie birds were being fed a steady diet of cupcakes.

Guess we'll find out how the next step is going to progress in another five months!

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thanks for the thoughts

But phew, what a bleak outlook. This is in line, I think, with a lot of the other things I’ve seen on the spring game, so I guess it’s not too surprising. Penalties were a huge, huge issue for Virginia last year, so to hear that they had an unsportsmanlike for their own spring game is…disheartening.

Looks like we’ll have another year of frustrating offense coupled with mediocre (but with sparks of inspiration) defense, then?

--
I have not yet begun to fight!
Streaking the Lawn | Twitter | Facebook

by Brian J. Leung on Apr 4, 2011 10:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Better to be honest

Than to make excuses and try and play it off. Know what you need to improve in, and you can improve in it. But yeah, it’s just a spring game- we got time to crank it in line.

by ragekage on Apr 4, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

An earnest question

I’m trying to avoid being incendiary, so please don’t interpret anything I say in that aspect. Why the enmity for Virginia Tech students? Why the condescension? I grew up in Blacksburg, and from the time I was 12 I aspired to become a plant geneticist. When it came time to consider college applications, the only only school to which I applied was Virginia Tech. The reason for this is simple: unlike UVA they have undergraduate degrees in horticulture science and biotechnology as well as biochemistry (perhaps this has changed by now, I do not know). I think UVA has outstanding graduate and doctorate programs, but I do not think UVA is the best option in Virginia for undergraduate studies in science and engineering (with the exception of human biology/pre-medical studies). The patron of UVA, Thomas Jefferson, emphatically extolled the virtues of agrarian society for much of his life. He eventually relented on his stance regarding machinery – he thought it could integrate harmoniously into the countryside. I can’t help but think he would have supported the Morrill Act. I am not sure he would approve of the arrogant attitude that his students have regarding the students of a land grant mechanical/agricultural university. The point of my rambling rhetoric is that I believe many students choose VT over UVA for reasons other than the stringent admission requirements.

I know UVA students and graduates love to disparage Tech students because they consider them to be of inferior intelligence. I suppose this strikes me as odd since all of my friends are scientists and engineers. If you look at admissions for 2010, the top major of incoming freshman was general engineering. Virginia Tech will never have the prestige and elan of UVA, but we are certainly not ignorant nor stupid.

Virginia is a wonderful state, and part of what makes it spectacular is the presence of all of our universities. I am proud of our state. I will always cheer for Virginia teams, whether it is UVA, VT, W&W, VCU, JMU, Radford, ODU – you name it. Not everyone is fortunate enough to have the provenance and lineage of the average UVA student but I do not see why that justifies a supercilious attitude towards others. After all, we need people who can improve agriculture and engineering just as need people who are erudite in law or who are adept physicians.

Anyway, I picked your post because I saw your attempts at trolling on the Gobbler Country blog. I wanted to ask a random UVA student/graduate why they believe Virginia Tech students/graduates are an inferior species. Is this behavior merely amicable in nature, like an older sibling for a younger one? Is it something more insidious? I am truly curious. I have a great deal of respect for UVA. I wonder why we are not entitled to the same.

by sobriquet on Apr 6, 2011 10:45 PM EDT reply actions  

I think you're mistaken

We love to give the Hokies crap- mostly for their seeming attitude of “If we’re bad at it, the sport doesn’t matter!”- and they give it to us right back. If you were on Gobbler Country, I assume you noticed what prompted my light-hearted disparagement of them (and the posting this missive). Ahh, it would have been hard to miss, I think.

You must have also missed that myself, Brian, and the other folks around here often post in support of VT Sports when they’re not playing UVA. For instance, you also must have explicitly missed that I was the only one to post something positive about VT baseball recently.

I think that’s an attitude, however, sadly lacking on both sides. I see far too many Tech people, more than UVA folks (though that could just be because there’s more of them) disparaging UVA as an institution, it’s students, etc in lieu of the sports. Perhaps you missed the homophobic slur one of the posters in that forum levied in my direction?

In summation, you make good points, I generally agree with what you say, but make sure you look at both sides and apply the same rationale to them.

by ragekage on Apr 7, 2011 7:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

It largely goes both ways

It’s great that you root for the Commonwealth, but I suspect you’re in the minority there. It’s a (mostly friendly) rivalry between two in-state schools — there’s no avoiding jabs like this. For as many times a Hoo calls a Hokie uneducated/dumb/inferior in every way, a Hokie calls a Hoo pretentious/snobby/wine-and-cheese.

Since you brought up Gobbler Country, remember they’re also the ones that said that “[Brendan’s] ‘s the only Hoo I’ve ever talked to for more than five minutes and haven’t wanted to punch in the throat.” And for their signing day around-the-ACC coverage, rather than put up 1 or 2 lines about our signing day like they did for all the other schools, they put “[wanking motion]”.

So I think it’s unfair to paint this as a one-way street of hateration, or to suggest that all Hokies root on the Hoos without reciprocation. I, of course, think that we generally get more hate from Hokies than we give, but that is probably just perspective. You should see how much hate I get from Hokies when I celebrate our non-revenue sports’ successes.

--
I have not yet begun to fight!
Streaking the Lawn | Twitter | Facebook

by Brian J. Leung on Apr 7, 2011 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

P.S.

I am confident Mike London will be a great asset to your team! I imagine him being as loyal to UVA as Beamer is to us. I am definitely anticipating seeing some interesting changes coming from his leadership.

by sobriquet on Apr 6, 2011 10:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the internet's most comprehensive coverage of the Virginia Cavaliers!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

308267_10100154501779006_1502560_47573870_1167166_n_small
Extension for Bennett?
Small
Playoffs and UVa
Streaking-xl_small
And now for something completely self-serving...help me win $500!
Streaking-xl_small
2013 Recruiting: A Glance at the Depth Chart (Part Two)
Streaking-xl_small
2013 Recruiting: A Glance at the Depth Chart (Part One)
Small
Where to watch UVa/ACC basketball in New Orleans?
Awesp_e_small
UVA football (Possible transfer?)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Streaking-xl_small Brian J. Leung

Editors

Horse_small Will Campbell

Sabres_small TikiUVA

Twitter_small Tim Mulholland

Photo_small Brian Schwartz

Streaking-xl_small Justin Ferber