Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Seahawks Trade for TE Kellen Winslow

Megaconference mania on the horizon...

Well, that didn't take long. Mere days after the administration at Texas A&M confirmed that they're going to jump conferences to the SEC, word comes that FOUR schools- OU, Texas, OSU, and Texas Tech- are looking seriously at making the PAC-12 become the PAC-16.

Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott said Saturday the conference isn't seeking expansion partners, but acknowledged that "schools have reached out to us." "We are not doing anything proactively," Scott said to reporters before Saturday's Oregon-LSU game. "We've not initiated anything. But schools have called us. And we are certainly going to listen. We always are going to evaluate."

Comissioner Scott denied his conference was being "predatory". Yeah, and by the way, I've got this awesome bridge to sell ya.

Star-divide

What more can I say? How long before the Big Ten and SEC get aggressive in turn? The SEC is almost certain- they'll want a school to compliment Texas A&M. So the big questions are:

A) What school is that going to be, and

B) What should the ACC do about it?

As for who the SEC will go after, I'm not sure. Mizzou, Virginia Tech, WVU, Florida State, amongst others have been floated as possibilities. FSU and VT obviously are big deals for us, but are they likely? Would Florida want FSU cutting in on their racket? Would state politics and the downsides to joining the SEC keep Virginia Tech in the ACC?

Now, as for what the ACC should do about it- well, no two ways about it. We should get just as aggressive. I say we make a bid- NOW- for WVU, UConn, ahh, maybe Syracuse, Pitt, and USF (heh, they were good enough to beat ND). Plus someone else. Hmm. Put us up to 16-18. Gosh, that seems like such a ridiculous number, but I don't think we have much of a choice. If we don't do it, someone else will.

I can't even the fathom the implications this will have on scheduling. I mean, teams are unlikely to be able to even play all the teams in our own division. If we went up to 16-18 schools, it'd take seven or eight games a season just to play everyone in the Atlantic division, say. So, what- two games for the opposing division, and two for other schools at large.

I dunno. I like to see variety. I enjoy getting to see Virginia play WAC and MAC schools, or Virginia Tech go up against Boise State- no insult there, fellas, I just enjoy good games against two good teams. I guess the biggest question is going to be a simple one, though- where's the money at? Because inevitably, that's the direction we'll end up going.

Thoughts?

FanPosts are user-generated content not necessarily endorsed by Streaking The Lawn.

Comment 1 comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Do we HAVE to be predatory?

At the risk of becoming Big East Football, does the ACC have to grow to 16-18 if all the other big boys are doing it? If the ACC can stay in tact, or relatively in tact and stay at 12, what are the benefits of adding 4-6? Would the schools want to split league revenue between 18 instead of 12? Syracuse would be a big get, market-wise (plus they’d add some to basketball, and certainly add to lacrosse, to the extent there’s much money there), but it wouldn’t fit the geographic mold (granted, that didn’t stop the BC addition). I’m not sure I see a combination of teams that would give us enough added market share that it’d be worth splitting the revenue with 4-6 other teams.

Unlike the other BCS conferences, I think we’re a little more limited geographically. Even the PAC 10 has a little more leeway in expanding eastward than we do expanding westward. Basically all the other leagues can expand in any direction they want. Obviously, geography is becoming less and less an issue, but my point in the first paragraph I think still stands.

--
I have not yet begun to fight!
Streaking the Lawn | Twitter | Facebook

by Brian J. Leung on Sep 5, 2011 12:03 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the internet's most comprehensive coverage of the Virginia Cavaliers!

Managers

Streaking-xl_small Brian J. Leung

Editors

Horse_small Will Campbell

Sabres_small TikiUVA

Twitter_small Tim Mulholland

Photo_small Brian Schwartz

Streaking-xl_small Justin Ferber